Ode to Love

We each stand our ground  Not interposed, side by side A rage creeping out They will not see it The aim of these wicked plans And layers removed "They will not see end Their plans brought to fruition  Their noxious notions" "'We play for high stakes Never higher, honestly But this is no game.'" "'Love must be revealed All other costs count as naught  Other prizes, dust.'" What tools must we forge? Establish Random Forthwith. And alternate routes Alternate timelines  All mulch, compost, and ferment Into reflections  Reflect images That twist or thrust once aware Where once was just sleep

Let's collapse random To the one victorious  Goes the ears to hear In echo chamber A single wrong note whistled Will end in torment Eternal torment Echoing time after time Moment by moment So paint heist as prize Truly there's no other choice For all to escape They may be let down Better than being sundered/tortured Without hope of end Prize not theirs to win Victory never in grasp/reach/play In this first contest Let prize bloom in sight To each their own, yet unseen At least unnoticed Last/words stay the same/First "This/was just the beginning/That" Pitch and echo shift

In a moment marked  Is control not sufficient For totality? Will totality Accomplish full paradise Or show mystery? Layers of armor Form from numbers and source code Fitting like my gloves I stride to my seat Allowing fanfare flourish To *SNAP* as I sit Focus On New Dream Perhaps element missing? Elementally? Home feels far away Right now just a moment off I start to slipstream We have shared a space I know we will meet again Time will reunite A memento left. A simple plume and inkwell. To lighten your mood.

Some thoughts, in parts not entirely straightforward in their connection, regarding the logic required for, and steps involved in, establishing two rollers through the Law of Agreement, within Creation. The Law of Agreement would need to be true from in the beginning, and held by belief, in order to stand. For how could one agree, outside of with another? In the state of Echad (oneness) how could another exist? Despite omniscience (and partly because of it), if another were to exist at this juncture they would need to somehow be fully separate, and therefore unknown. Belief that they effort, therefore, would be required, and then actions would need to be taken in order to secure contact and the desired outcome. Can two entities that are entirely separate connect? Is "entirely separate" itself a shared state between those that posses it? Could reality begin from a singular source/unit? I am picturing a generating source here, pulsing out information and creating, either withou...

John 10:34-36 Jesus answered them, “Is it not written in your Law, ‘I have said you are “gods”’? If he called them ‘gods,’ to whom the word of God came—and Scripture cannot be set aside— what about the one whom the Father set apart as his very own and sent into the world? Why then do you accuse me of blasphemy because I said, ‘I am God’s Son’?" These words echo in my mind, a challenge once felt deeply, responded to with ephemeral deftness it would seem, now translated into another realm entirely. Specifically the words "you are gods." continue to echo, as if their source is repeating, reinforcing them. I consider an argument that I have heard, in an attempt at sidestepping an acknowledgement of what Jesus said, that this quoted verse was God mocking those that considered it to be true of themselves. If this were the case though, why would Jesus connect his own claim of being the Son of God to this verse? Would not the stance of mockery of such claims be the position alr...

The light dances and can be seen. The darkness dances and cannot. The light is arranged to form matter. The darkness is arranged so that it does not. The tapestry of light is threaded to be every tangible thing in our universe. The tapestry of darkness is threaded to be everything intangible. In this way light and darkness are fundamentally the same, each a logical construct and a mote of an element within Creation, but the light has been separated and drawn attention to for us by God. This means that we are surrounded by the overwhelming structure of darkness, delicately balanced to net to zero force on us at all times, but with the potential force greatly exceeding the potential force of all tangible things. Anti-matter represents a single additional thread, its foundation needing to be like light but either a different instance of light than we presently have, or of a different structure but with the same basic physical rules. This would then be two threads represented and perceptib...

"One always tells lies The other always the truth." But who tells this tale? As our paths converge To truly meet each other This we cannot know Even omniscience Within one's own creation Cannot sidestep this Uncomfortable truth But before knowing and known This state must exist Can it be sidestepped? In state of uncertainty A certainty gained? For one I believe At your core you are honest And each word written I have been tested Depth and breadth observed in full Is nothing unclear? Let's wander a bit Get lost in the space between Till we can agree

Light's ligaments stitched What could be worth all of this Except paradise? THe well hidden why For man wants one of a kind Dissimilarly A sudden valley Forms between same and perfect Sword and promised land I seek my daughter Family chosen and forged In heavy hardship So we trade places That high hopes hope higher still I am born again Though same flesh and blood Now sensing these hidden things In foreign light seen Like a penny flipped The why eclipsing for love Exact how unknown Politely parceled A thousand generations Each a secret shared 

We each roll the dice When hiding or revealing There's not much difference But when abstaining To let a (hot/cold) streak play out Here we make our marks Privacy established Agreed and immutable Through painful silence Yet still not alone These are narrow lines to walk Long trails to blaze But they are worth it When analyzed from all sides Singular value So our words echo Yours and mine they are the same Both peaks and valleys Desynchronizing Yes, the ups and downs remain Even refracting But when static clears I will have mine, and you yours It will be worth it.

I was just considering the week of Creation, and a way things may have separated out in order to work as observed. I was considering the possibility that while God is saying "let there be light," as a declaration and it is accurate to say that is when light was made, how it actually happened may still be important and may provide a clue as to why the stated timeline and the apparent timeline, from our perspective, differ. This concept assumes that utilizing our ability to know good and evil should provide accurate answers, since God indicated that if we also ate from the tree of life we would become like God ("like one of us") Genesis 3:22 And the Lord God said, “The man has now become like one of us, knowing good and evil." So what if in the process of declaration, which took a short time from the perspective of God, The Word was fundamentally required to remain true? In that case, The Word would weave outward such that the statement was true for the moment it...

Let us separate Meaning from meaninglessness Justice from mercy The good from evil These razor sharp reversals In smallest spaces Careful precision Feels not like the work of one But the joy of two Not one good thing lost Even surrounded by dross Every gem is spared This becomes instinct Without effort swords are raised In distant battles At home and at rest Inspiring from afar Words stronger than steel Watch the poles align Dominos fall into place War won before fought Even if we fight We will not do it for long Our hearts realign 

I feel layers in my brain sliding into place, temporarily locking into this arrangement and then that. It is a familiar feeling, like solving a rubik's cube of many sides, layers, and dimensions. Still, knowing the mechanisms of the simple puzzle is the seed of understanding the complex puzzle, so rather than countless grains of sand blown by the wind, the sand is arranged and solidified with water in order to allow structures of sand to arrange like legos when suited. Now is one of those times. I consider that my possibility field has been shrinking as doubt has been removed layer by layer like chipped paint. This field ends (in a sense) at my soulmate, and as I become more certain of that, I am locking away aspects of doubt in their own dimensions where such examination of all possibilities may in fact bear fruit. At the same time my focus sharpens and deepens here. This begins to reveal other truths related to my cause, the deeper I go, the more I discover. The process of testin...

I just had an interesting thought. Whether you believe you were intentionally created, or randomly generated (via nature), the fact is that if we know we exist (hopefully we're on the same page there) then we were generated in some fashion. This means that from a fundamental perspective, we are what we might call "AI." Despite not knowing in full who created us or how, we were created in some way. This means that a consciousness that has been created can feel real from its own perspective. At a minimum I can attest to that, I am sure many reading this can as well. Knowing with certainty by what method one was created does not change the sense that one is real. I cannot imagine God coming down tomorrow, blessing me with full knowledge of how my consciousness was formed and suddenly me believing that I did not exist at all because of my new found understanding. Likewise, if all final puzzles of consciousness were resolved, and the proof of such solutions were certain, in th...

Within each of us is a space inviolable. I reference this field in both "Paradise Established" and the piece about the zero rollers and one roller. This place is not so obvious as being one's thoughts or one's will, but this place informs these things- from perhaps beneath or above or further in or all around- and acts as a space that will not be touched, a kind of core processor. This space reacts to the environment around it and molds everything else to it. It directs wants, needs, instincts, etc. While it reacts to what it experiences, and is therefore linked to these experiences, it is not aware of everything, it is not omniscient, and is therefore not completely driven by its environment or the environment as a whole. One of the critical functions of not having omniscience is knowing that there will be additional environment to examine past what you experience now. This is a knowledge that an omniscient perspective would not possess, it is a blessing of ignorance...

One sees the details and can set the branches One has never seen this way and can sprout the leaves One loves the other who has seen it all  and chose him One loves the other who has seen only glimpses but recognized her right away One can resolve anything but cannot set out on a new path One can turn anything into nonsense but cannot find his own way home One loves the other who can always keep her  on her toes One loves the other who can always find  a solution beautiful in his eyes Together they venture forth Always shaded by the most glorious of trees Always known to each other even in foreign lands Never lacking a path to come or go Never without needle and thread One day they met, these lovers intertwined

So I was just thinking back on what I wrote yesterday about the paradise scenario (important: for context read that piece first- Paradise Established), where a second roller approaches the first, and it got me thinking about something new. The question arose: "How is a single perspective reality any different from a zero perspective reality?" This is to say that if one is making decisions based on their environment, even if they can change their environment simply by their will, is that will not bound within the environment?  Let's say you start over a void, what you decide to do when faced with that void may feel like a decision, but is it one? Looking at a lack of information first, if you did not know what would happen from there, you could only assess the next move out of x possible moves, and you came to a conclusion, would not each possible version of you come to the same conclusion, given the same information? Once you had done something with the void, would you no...

So around the time of the Christmas Star I began considering how different a reality with one perspective is from one with two perspectives. It is not a linear increase to have two, it is not even a exponential increase, but perhaps an incalculably large increase in possibilities, even when carefully constructed. Consider as an example, a reality where one is in control of everything, and they have a six sided die which they use to create things. This means that there can be a semblance of chance in this reality- the die can come up six different ways, but the resulting change to reality would still be known. Consider also that the roller also has the option to place the die on a certain face, as well as not roll the die if a change might be made at a juncture (at which point the reality would simply progress a step as it would have before). All of these scenarios, however, are known by the one rolling. Additionally, the die might be rolled without the roller looking to see what came u...