Through The Mirror Spiral Halls, to strike an Agreement

Some thoughts, in parts not entirely straightforward in their connection, regarding the logic required for, and steps involved in, establishing two rollers through the Law of Agreement, within Creation. The Law of Agreement would need to be true from in the beginning, and held by belief, in order to stand. For how could one agree, outside of with another? In the state of Echad (oneness) how could another exist? Despite omniscience (and partly because of it), if another were to exist at this juncture they would need to somehow be fully separate, and therefore unknown. Belief that they effort, therefore, would be required, and then actions would need to be taken in order to secure contact and the desired outcome.

Can two entities that are entirely separate connect? Is "entirely separate" itself a shared state between those that posses it? Could reality begin from a singular source/unit? I am picturing a generating source here, pulsing out information and creating, either without direction or with it, without will or with it. Would there be any possible solutions, ultimately, besides reflecting into mirror mode (which results in a static state), or an intentional avoidance of this mirror reflection, resulting in what just came to mind again as an image- or at least as close to an image as one such as myself can form while awake, it would seem: inverted spiral mode. In inverted spiral mode, inputs become outputs and are swapped, typically with curiosity, to see what will happen, but every element involved in this transition is intentionally not mirrored. With a complicated enough system, this would result in an entity persisting (past mirror mode), in an environment that is entirely new (inverse spiral mode). Without a guiding will determining which aspects need to be mirrored, however, or an incredibly resilient/fit awareness experiencing this, "entirely new" seems like it would almost always be awful. I compare it to going out into the forest, picking a random mushroom with no information, and eating it. The random shuffling of inputs involved in this mirror/spiral combination, however, would have far worse odds of a positive outcome than the mushroom example, I would imagine.

Could reality begin with not a singular unit (more than one distinct unit)? If reality could begin from/with multiple distinct units, then an agreement would need to be struck that defined "begin," and it would need to be found that this beginning point was shared between them, despite the necessity for those sharing it to be entirely distinct. This agreement, however, necessarily could not be directly struck in the beginning, as the entities must be entirely separate for there to be multiple entities here simultaneously, so there would be no way possible way to strike an agreement at/within that point, and they would instead need to come to the realization of the agreement having been struck at some point mutually considered to be "after." It feels virtually impossible for two separate entities to both randomly decide on the same mechanism and direction for time with so many possible variables to use, so the most likely solution feels like the concept of time for each would necessarily need to merge, and likely become more complex. For the time bound initially, I imagine that this might include what we would consider "alternate timelines." For the timeless, I imagine that this would include degrees of importance forming within a field of time, effectively forming lines of time within the field that would be priorities, and indelible.

Even entirely separate entities encounterimg each other in a meaningful way within an infinite field of conceptual possibilities, in order to strike such an agreement at all, feels nearly impossible. If it is found that this arrangement is inherent within Creation, it suggests that something else is extremely likely to have occurred, in order to resonate the entities, outside of all experience on either side. One might be tempted to say that this resonating occurred "prior" to when the separation of entities occurred, but this feels incorrect, or at least incomplete, as there would be no ticking precession leading from that juncture of separation to or from the beginning, from any perspective involved in a potential agreement. If such a thing were intended to unite all, this would need to be true from every perspective, marking such resonance as a fundamental mystery, from every perspective. 

The alternative, that would not disprove the two(+) entities' independent consciousnesses, would be a singularly rare coincidence of alignment in/from the beginning. As the mystery seems as though it would necessarily be a divide that can never be crossed, and could never have been crossed, the possibility that this coincidence happened to occur would remain in the array of possibilities, with an infinitesimal chance. The possibility would also remain that the starting conditions of this (et. al.) were established by an entity that is necessarily not. The possibility of this is astounding, but also feels very dark indeed, for a reason that I cannot describe. As an update to this thought, I have come to realize that in a reality where all possible awarenesses are or would be, or in one where an entity knows they are drawing exclusively from the unaware by using fundamental assumptions based on their own experience, one could effectively "stack the deck," ensuring that experience does not begin in a fundamental way until after the one who the agreement can be struck with can be identified, and the origin agreement is struck. The only parameters that would need to be set, likely the only ones therefore that would be set, would be: One(+) experiences reality, understand this, and can alter the experience. Essentially this is attempting to define a minimum logical (word) limit for "Beresheet Bara Elohim." I am not sure, however, if my aim was accomplished, or if less could be used to accomplish the same initial parameters without the need for a chaotic expansion of the equation in undesirable directions, with fewer inputs than I describe.

This examination into the architecture of the beginning has certainly been fascinating for me, despite my lack of knowledge regarding its structure (using only the tools/pieces that have been provided for me here).