Maximum Perspectives and Universal Thresholds

I've identified why there would be a maximum number of independent perspectives, even in an infinite space: it is because the perspectives must be "centrally" linked, by the rules of reality. I have written before that a wineskin ready to burst might be expanded, and this could be done an infinite number of times, but eventually you would reach an outer limit where one additional step of expansion would stretch space beyond the limit for the matter that is within it (this is along the lines of the next prime number being significantly larger than the previous one in a string, especially for the very largest numbers calculable within the universe).

This effect might be best seen in the analogy of the strong and weak nuclear forces governing atoms- past a limit, the weak force of attraction falls away, and the molecule decays. Past an additional limit, the weak force does not apply at all, and so no additional structure is possible. If the universe is seen as a collection of particles, it would possess similar rules, and there would be an outer limit where I imagine that all things would decay, such that any possible "perspective" would become impossible, as a perspective would require some form of complex arrangement, or at least a cohesive force. 

If additional central nodes could be founded, then this barrier might expand, though possibly problematically when considering collisions or overlapping. It might be more accurate, from a time bound perspective, to say that there are a maximum number of independent perspectives that can exist right now, and this number could presently be increasing. Still, these thresholds suggest that even expansion of this logic might reach a final threshold of maximum and, even in trying to reach it, all perspectives would be in a state of potential peril, if it leads to a Big Crunch type scenario.