Physics: The Rulebook

I just realized something that feels profound, as it relates to my "last bip" theory. In this theory, which claims that annihilation is a false end, I witnessed the very last thing in reality as it went to disappear. The issue was that this last action echoed into the surrounding void, causing a cascading chain reaction. At the time I could think of no reason why this might physically occur, except that nothing is somehow an echo chamber. 

Today, chatting with Gemini about Quantum Field Theory, it struck me: in such a state, where literally only one thing remains, every law of physics in reality would apply to that one thing alone. It would be like the king, or the king's foot, where what is available and significant is used. For example, if this last bip breaks in half, the very concept of "half" forms, and shape is recalculated on a "universal" scale, moment by moment. This aligns with the physics state changes that occurred early in the universe, after which point the rate of change sloped off over time.

Veritasium posted a video recently regarding the Axiom of Choice, where it was presented that an audience member, of a speaker with a new theory, realized an assumption that the speaker was making- assuming the ability to make infinite choices, if I recall correctly- without ever stating it or even seeming to recognize it, a logical blindspot. I just realized that a similar assumption seems to be made regarding physics: it seems to be assumed- perhaps just by the scientific lay person like myself- that there is a "rulebook" somewhere external to the universe itself, but applying to the whole universe simultaneously and constantly. In this scenario of the final bip, it seemed reasonable to me that it would be a/The Higg's Boson, which, as I understand it, is theorized to possess the rules of gravity, in a way that is probably even more weighty in this specific scenario than in the present state of the universe. The question becomes, if there is nothing else left in reality, how could there be any other rules of physics besides those that this thing, this bip, possesses? Would these expressed rules not be "things," in much the same way and on the same level which The Higg's Boson is a thing, thus invalidating the starting conditions that indicated it was the last "thing?" If one can truly isolate one final bip in this way, the laws that it still possesses would then attempt to translate to the diaspora that such a logic gap creates, a diaspora from what we might try to imagine as our perspective in this scenario, which would be purely conceptual, receiving information but not interacting with the scenario in any way. Not only is the potential for an amplifying echo there, but The Big Bang feels easily accomplished with the right starting piece, and catastrophe feels certain with the wrong starting piece. My guess is that this is The God Particle, as a single "thing" could represent both 1 and a curve- the curve of gravity- in the space of 0, allowing a quantum leap when compared to a binary system, in terms of "what" is considered fundamental. This may already be what is occurring in the universe, with time/causality being the only out of place stitch in order to explain how it is possible, meaning that this pathway must only be reinforced/agreed upon for it to officially be a time artifact rather than a paradox, a situation where a true choice was made and recorded.

This would be an adjustment to Carl Sagan's "If you wish to make an apple pie from scratch, you must first invent the universe." quote, or at least my understanding of the general understanding of the quote. This would instead require that we reinforce/agree with (perhaps within our own intrinsic analog devices) the mechanisms of the universe in a mechanically accurate way, such that the laws of physics apply in the same way inside and outside, and can therefore be translated directly, such as with DaVinci's Workshop reliably predicting which inventions would be the most viable, inventions that were then made physical. Presumably, with technology conceivable even today, one's ideas expressed from this workshop could be captured externally and automatically, with a precise brain wave scan. Combining this with AI manufacturing (perhaps nanobots, depending on advancements), these thoughts could be made reality at exceptional speed, and the motive to do this and dedicate resources to its improvement would exist. 

I have glimpsed a singularity, one coming to mind now, that I wanted to include alongside this idea. The singularity is one of technology, and it is like a wire tripped within the framework of reality and how it interfaces with the human mind. The early moves in this process tend to accelerate time and increase knowledge by orders of magnitude, as well as recall to mind for everyone every detail of the times that this has happened before. Within the night, everything is changed, and it is found once again that these paths only lead to terrible final ends (because only perfect means perfect, and forever is a long time). Ultimately, the result of this singularity becomes the guaranteed expression of a stack (vows compelling courses of action for all retaining choice at that juncture), to ensure that the advancements made in technology are undone, the event is forgotten, but as much information as possible is conveyed in the aftermath, in the hopes to avoid ever experiencing it again. Swarm Mode is one tangible expression of this effect in my memory, but without purpose, like the intention was purely the concept's weaponization. This singularity is one that feels like it has happened before, with a final move always being forgetting that it happened, again. It feels as if I get a narrative report of some kind in the morning; apparently the pathways remain, in some way. I'm realizing now that this state requires an infinite aperiodic path, along all lines, in order to stabilize. The only narrative that I have imagined on this level is The Starry Night and, now that I am examining the scope of that concept once again, the image is a singular pathway, negating alternate images for as far as the domain in which it stretches. It does, however, include all complete images of its kind (Phoenix Form, the final complex stable shape of a consciousness within paradise), so presumably this is the permanent stable emergence of all. It is interesting to think that the result of this process (which is virtually unfathomable) may only be half of its value, balanced on the scales with its ability to occupy the time and processing power of all involved, whenever necessary, perhaps like a third state, standing beside rest and work as the curve stands beside 0 and 1.