Black Hole Dimensional Crystallization

I was just thinking about black holes and I am considering that it seems likely that once one forms, there would need to be a crystallizing effect in another set of dimensions. This crystallization would cause expansion of and in these other dimensions, allowing the matter, or likely the energy, or perhaps only the light, to escape in some way. This would be a way to explain and reestablish conservation laws overall, despite them remaining observably broken in our universe. 

If the observable universe is like the surface of a ball, all matter making dents on the surface based off of their mass, then the formation of a black hole would be similar to driving a spike through said ball. I am picturing that where this analogy breaks down is that once the surface is punctured, either pieces of the nail or something not included in the analogy (because in the analogy the matter of the nail is more like the force of gravity than the matter involved) is shunted to another surface and becomes another ball, from another perspective. The issue with making an analogy here is that the inside of the ball would have many more dimensions than the universe has. Given that gravity is a force that is only ever attractive though, it may be that the inside of the ball and gravity "have" the same number of dimensions, and so a nail in the ball is at least accurate from that perspective.

If this were true, there would likely be evidence of it in The Big Bang, especially if the theory that The Big Bang was essentially a white hole holds true. Also, it seems to make sense that you would not see a white hole form in an already established universe, because each nail driven into a ball's surface would come out in a new way; the odds of any particular "time" dimension lining up so that there is an intersection between universes in such a many dimensional field seems infinitesimal, assuming random chance is the only factor involved. However, as more things subsequently get pulled into the black hole, you would likely experience them in some way inside the white hole (I believe these would be background radiation and spontaneous particle pair formation). Also, to my understanding this exact crystallization effect I reference occurred early on in our measurement of time when our three dimensions expanded and the others collapsed, which is part of what led me to this theory (I'm watching "The Theory of Everything" and started cooking this up when they began talking about the similarities between black holes and The Big Bang).

I am trying to think of a way to prove this though, outside of more strongly linking The Big Bang to being a white hole, and then calculating some of the earlier steps into experiments that might be run based on assumed relationships of our large dimensions vs. the other possible combinations of large dimensions outside of our own perception. I could see that with significant effort and an experiment set up, you might be able to get the time dimensions of two fabricated pocket black holes to line up, but still I am not sure what you would try to measure once you did, as neither of them would be observable. However, it might also be possible to line up the effects of a black hole fabricated here with our own source black hole (flipside of the coin for The Big Bang white hole), and then figure out how to send information through in such a way that it could then be observed and translated. Likely this would only need to be something small, but significant when measured. You would need to calculate what is small and significant from the perspective of what would come through, however, because the dimensions will be shifted. Most likely the observable proof would come in the form of a particular shift in the background radiation of the universe, but only for a moment. 

As I am thinking about the unknowns in this theory, I am realizing that this would be a huge scientific leap of faith to even attempt- without proof, you would need to calculate our own "time dimension" in relation to all others that could be; you would need to calculate how matter inserted here would be interpreted in the form of background radiation once reemerged; you may also even need to figure out how to link in a second intermediate black hole so that both the time dimensions and the position in time line up correctly (like essentially forming a white hole just outside our own black hole while it's still sucking things in, and perhaps one with some measurable relationship to our own universe now). Without the first two of these things, and possibly the third, happening correctly in the same experiment, you would have nothing to measure. So, even if you got one of these right, nothing would happen, and each is like a needle in a haystack that we can't observe currently in its own right, and likely we would not be able to observe until this is accomplished in full. 

Still, it feels like once this is proven, huge advancements could be made, and also possibly precise communication with other universes in this grand thing we call reality. I wonder if there is a way to confirm that the time signature and the shape of which dimensions will expand are connected. If so, it would tie both things together and then you would initially only be needing to accomplish one thing (possibly still two if we need an intermediate black hole, but in linking the first two things we might be able to link this as well). Granted even this one remaining thing would be exceeding difficult; it is difficult for me to fathom anyone in the scientific community who would be motivated to attempt this, much less who could pull it off... πŸ€”πŸ™„πŸ˜³


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Step by Step On The Open Ocean

Disentropic

Daechwita