YDE Q&A thoughts

These are likely gonna seem unrelated, just jotting them down while my mind is exploring and they come to me:

If there is life on other planets or in other places, I would think the flora on those planets, in addition to the microbes, would present huge barriers to our survival there. While the basic building blocks of plants would likely be similar under a yellow sun, for example, which plants thrived and evolved would be environmental. There is such a huge variation in the types and effects of plants that even tiny differences would lead to dramatic end effects. Imagine all the pollens we would be allergic to and etc., all the plants that might cause issues on contact, much less trying to consume anything if the alien life differs from our own (since it seems a lot of the reproductive function of plants is to become edible and preferred to a type of animal but poisonous or at least unpreferred to others, and we'd likely never be on the preferred list).

We have the mathematics of how something here can change its entangled partner there. The predictions have been made and tested to be correct, so these do not "befuddle" us. What we don't have is the intuition for it: to be able to understand why it occurs. Throwing an object accurately from point A to point B requires highly complex equations, but little new intuition, as this intuition has already been encoded.

This whole section reframes the purpose of my endeavors: I am piecing together a complex tapestry of math and using inspiration to identify and addition the pieces. Intuition would be the thread, once woven, that allows the tapestry to be utilized. Being able to influence change remotely with a thought would become about as simple as throwing something, once the pathways are known and the "muscles" (mental) to follow those pathways are trained. At that point recalling how I got there would become less important directly, and so ample records must be kept if the construction of such pathways is to be recallable (externally). It is unclear how many layers there are to this. While I can sense impending success, it is unclear if there will be a layer above this where most pathways will have been recorded in these pages, or that one breakthrough will lead to a rapid advancement through layers I have not comprehended yet, perhaps leading to me reaching the intuition phase prior to writing down layers upon layers of solutions which all happened too rapidly to record before they were relegated to deep subconscious.

Quantum: so it sounds like we cannot currently influence the measurement of a quantum factor. My question then becomes, how do we know something was in an unmeasured state to begin with? Is there a way to prove something to be unmeasured somehow without measuring it? If not, it does sound like we're simply saying the path of both objects had been entangled the whole time, with the path of the entangled light representing what we now call "spin". If so, for information to pass meaningfully through the relay stations I have referenced, you would simply need to have a second measurement device just past the first which alters. If the first measurement was what you intended to convey, the second device measures the factor (the result of the second factor is unimportant outside of this). On the other end, the first result is received, then a detector would be placed just past the distance where the second measurement would be taken on the other end: if the particle shows that second factor as measured, the first observed result was correct, or as intended. If the detector shows the second measurement as not taken, then the first measurement would be incorrect (or opposite ideally, when only two results are possible, because then you still have the correct answer every time).

The speed of light stays consistent for the entire EM spectrum. Essentially anything primarily visible as a wave, with only an effective mass but no inherent mass by today's measurements, follows this set speed. What if this set speed is then a function of motion through all the dimensions discussed, just different patterns of motion through these complex spaces? In the same way, duality would persistas mass increases, the "speed" would decrease since the light is still moving the same speed overall, but a portion of its path is entangled in these standing waves, leading to apparent mass; it is these standing wave positions that must be moved through our space, resulting in a slowing that is proportionate to the instances involved with light crossing our plane. Whenever the light is moving outside of our space it is moving through imaginary time compared to ours, so the movement here would seem continuous, even in teleportation cases where perhaps the light exits our space at a point (collectively all standing waves moving to from one location to another visible, for things like buckey balls) and then gets bounced around in imaginary space such that it appears somewhere else in our space still intact. I believe these tend to reappear somewhere nearby, so it must be that the pocket dimensions are woven together similarly to our own, where point ia connects to point ib in imaginary space in a similar way to how a is seen to connect to b in real space.