Zero Turn Maneuver
I define any system with rules as a "game," strictly for the purposes of categorization. Games can be extremely complex, like the human brain, which must still follow rules to operate, but the rules of which we haven't the slightest clue on (though there are camps that think they do).
Presumably, any game must exist before it is played, which means that it must be created, even if by Chance.
Yet this does not reconcile to a true "first turn," if everything is a nested group of games. The logic forms an apparent paradox, in terms of a beginning.
Still, I exist, and this must have occurred somehow. This experience within an apparent paradox leaves the "last bip" time artifact for an extremis ending, which I have written of previously. For this reason, existence at large cannot cease, perhaps even my existence specifically cannot cease.
Some months back now I came up with the "Zero Turn Maneuver," which is necessarily "Soul Splitting." Each entity aware on this level has one of these, untouchable externally, like the gap between 0 and ¤, with ¤ being the functionally infinitesimal number, the smallest number that could ever possibly be calculated/expressed. 1/2¤ could not be calculated, because all resources would have been exhausted to reach ¤. Two examples that might be possible to calculate/express- but certainly not within our universe- would be 1/G64, or a number that is G64 zeroes after a decimal point, followed by a 1 (With G64 being Graham's Number). If this methodology is taken to its limit within all reality, ¤ is calculated/expressed; beyond it is incalculable. In this incalculable space, where there is no firm knowledge or tangible rules, the Zero Turn Maneuver is taken. In this space, You and Notyou split, as do Me and Notme.
While this is a rule, it can only be assessed afterward, from any possible trajectory, and it can only be made- or more accurately "conceived of"- from inside the game, regarding a position that is not in a game, by this definition of "game." While we might be able to choose who we are with this methodology, we then have no control over who we are not- over what else exists- as this is a product of the environment of everything that is possible, with us carved out of it. It is effectively a crystallization of the comprehension of the void.
If this does not hold, if it can be breached- or perhaps rather is breached, taking the expression of will into account as a force balancing all others at this juncture- then the result is the undoing of the anchor that I suggest, with true Chaos experienced in its place, by all aware entities involved in the game of existence.
Comments
Post a Comment