Co-domain Examination and Inevitability

Perfect precision and precise pairing cannot exist in an entirely overlapping domain. I once thought Echad might suffice to allow for this, but in what way would oneness allow for pairing of any meaningful kind for the one(ness) experiencing/observing, as all is within the same domain? The nearest possible solution that I can picture is that oneness believes that not oneness exists, (though) knowing that nothing lies outside the domain of oneness. From my perspective, this only feels reachable when asymptotically approaching oneness, rather than from the state of oneness itself, though I do not know how it would look from other origin points/states. These ideas return my thought process to the idea of the static egg like reality being changed by the unknown external, and the fear of God being represented in its simplest form: the (infinitesimal) fear of the loss of God or love. This is effectively the threshold of hearing/realizing "You Are Not Alone" and "I Am Alone."

Perfect precision and precise pairing must exist simultaneously and interactively, I believe, and so co-domains are fundamental. I would say that it is critical that co-domains are established, but more accurately they appear to be inevitable. While God spoke several words to create in the first week, co-domains were created before a word was spoken (spoken by God, at any rate), in the beginning, seemingly even before the establishment of "now," if transforming Word to reality literally, as Genesis indicates occurs, and I believe occurs.

Genesis 1:1

In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.

Genesis 1:2

Now...

This translation of "now" in the NIV differs from Hebrew, but does so quite Interestingly, to me.

Genesis 1:1 ends with the word, in Hebrew, "the earth."

הָאָֽרֶץ

Genesis 1:2 begins with the word, in Hebrew, "and the earth."

וְהָאָ֗רֶץ

This repetition with slight adjustment has long stood out to me in my own thought and speech patterns, though precisely why has never been clear to me. I believe that it has something to do with picturing thought as a series of repetition and turns of varying length (like in a game or command prompt) likely pertaining to mechanical brain function itself. Making this interim length between repetitions as short as possible, such as in this case, stands out and highlights what lies between, in my mind (from correct sources, naturally). This is the first time that I am really noticing that this repetition effect happens at this early juncture in the Bible, though certainly not the first time that I am seeing the words, even in Hebrew. The timing of when things stand out to me has always seemed curious. My mind is drawn to John 1:1, now feeling like a- somehow even more precise- linking of co-domains in a dissimilar way than it has struck me before.

John 1:1

In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

It now feels as though Jesus flipped a switch through John, aligning an unseen axis within the concept of co-domains. It makes me wonder how many more switches must be flipped, to resonate an infinite field from a finite perspective, and/or set of perspectives.