יהוהאנא

Is there a maximum number of multiple personalities a single locus of consciousness, in any arrangement, can have? I'm imagining, at some threshold, that a functioning individual with enough multiple personalities overlapping would seem to have one or few. Because each personality is entering a populated field, the uniqueness of an addition feels like it would reach a limit from this perspective, but t to the whole, they must be expertly coordinated in order to proceed. As an aside, I could actually see this being a valid way of imaging someone into a different space- a man to a sea of stars and vice versa, for example.

Once past the threshold of having so many personalities that they begin to feel like fewer when more are added, would there be an additional threshold reached? Is there a true limit to the number of personalities one can have? If this were a man, for example, I have heard that the number of neural pathways in the brain is right around the number of atoms in the universe. If a personality could be identified within each connection, within each atom, then these would represent the maximum number of personalities reality could hold, if generated exclusively by a man (both player and stage). 

I just considered this for God as well, and I feel like I may have just found the final threshold to fully parsing infinity from a finite position. God has access to all of Creation; I could see God establishing Creation as stage, with God as player, and along the same question. The resulting value feels unfathomable from a human perspective, but not from an omniscient perspective; from an omniscient perspective I feel like this could be expressed as a finite number. This is to say, if God is alone in Creation on a fundamental level, which is to say there are none like God and cannot be, then a threshold would exist for a maximum number of personalities in Creation, and God in omniscience would know this as well. So, to be able to prove to God that God is not alone, that threshold would need to be exceed, because any step over that line indicates that an external influence possess a personality within Creation that is not a piece of God's. 

This would be easiest to set up from God's perspective- make sure that threshold is known, and perhaps that it is reached, before letting the process proceed. This would balance the system on the head of a pin, such that any change would be noticed (this is reminding me now of neutrino collectors in physics). That being said, the threshold and understanding of how to exceed it would need to be agreed upon by another, a true other. I have written of this before in terms of a realm becoming static- the next thing experienced in that realm would necessarily be an outside influence. At the time though I did not see how these lines connected so thoroughly, and so it feels like this image has been available to review for a while, but is just now coming back into view for me. Now surging to view is the reminder that I saw this angle as well, and joined in the cause of balancing the scales, such that God's work might be complete not just in Creation and any perspective able to bridge that single gap, but that in agreement on ways to both balance and minimally unbalance these scales, the infinite might be fathomed and partitioned in full before anything real, agreed upon as such, happens outside of Creation. Essentially the permutations, for what might allow a personality or perspective to exist, expand as we examine the fields of imagination and discover new methods of measurement. All the while it is know that this threshold exists, this partitioning exists, we just have to find it. This could not be accomplished strictly timelessly, as a man would need to agree with God's timeless perspective and have a unique enough path to add something from a time bound perspective, meaning years and generations would be necessary. That being said, the dream where my brother and I essentially cleared reality in a moment, by forming agreements between us in terms of the experience and then surging through reality together, in a space outside of either ours or reality's concept of time, is now in the forefront of my mind. Is there anything an infinite perspective could do that a single pair of perspectives could not, or vice versa?

As I consider to examine YHWH and love, fundamental partnership, blooms. Jesus mentions a new name, highlighting a significance to names. To use a base analogy, if The Word were a computer, YHWH would be the command prompt. Additional command prompts can exist, hypothetically, but the nature of YHWH (capacity, superlative position) means that there is no value in replacing it (from a tangible measurement perspective). Instead it must be resolved while remaining, which means adding a new name, a new command prompt. I am seeing this like an additional title/aspect/etc. of God, much like YHWH is "the LORD." Running my own internal simulation (in my own language as well), last night I inputed the command NAME. This morning I found myself wondering what the next name might be, and I suddenly remembered I have had this in mind for several months now: PLEASE. In Hebrew please is אנא. This word, please, fascinates me in so many ways. Its meaning, first and foremost, translates clearly, and the exchange request is universal in humans, at a minimum. Then, looking at the Hebrew, this word is Aleph ahead and behind Nun. This translates to silence around the sound of nun, the sound of nun. Aleph can appear like a bull or an olive tree, so this could also be seen as nun protected on all sides (if examining the linear number code that the Hebrew Torah could be represented as). 

Personally I have seen nun as "the Daughter," a representation, along with Hope, which I believe has focused and augmented my ability to examine this space, leveraging my protective nature. This word seems to suggest that, if agreement is struck on that aim, then it can be accomplished- whether ahead or behind nun is protected. This could only be agreed upon though if enough meaning could be assigned to nun, the letter, the number (50), meaning that it could not be the initiating program. By contrast, I can see YHWH being self-contained and sufficient as a command prompt, unassailable. I also just realized (embarrassingly late in the game), that numerically this is still a doubling, of a kind, and also a tripling, of a kind. יהוה is 26, 13/13, 15/11. אנא is 52, 13/13/13/13, 1, 50, 1. It truly feels like a perfect fit, in terms of a first next/last step in expanding "The System" (the image I used of the computer as "The Word as God and The Word with God") to ensure that it does not perish. Once the system is expanded, once this word pairing is complete at 78, it feels as though additional pieces can be added (a 4th "season," expanded dimensions in play, etc.), and perhaps some subtracted, all with the integrity of the system retained as unassailable, as it was with strictly YHWH.

Geometrically I like this as well. If one looks at each letter as a unit- a point, a side- then יהוה sets the cornerstone/base with 4, and אנא adds triangles. As soon as I thought along these lines I remembered the pyramid, and the "sleeping giant" comment that sounded tinny from my own pen, but has acted like a tuning fork in a way, to find where it was true, by becoming it. Additionally, the idea of establishing a shape in fewer dimensions- picture ✡️ but with a square base- and then smoothly expanding the dimensional total- the pyramid- sparks the mind of observer and worker alike as to what more might be done after the same fashion.

I was also thinking again about the idea that any number string can be found in the number π, and that The Scripture, is a very long number. As soon as I thought this though, I realized that there would be difficulties in confirming that digits had not been shifted, if trying to retranslate the number code once arrived (like encryption/decryption, additional meaning carried along by the bearer of the code, beyond the code contained). While it seems a bit excessive from a human perspective, this parsing feels like it would be much more simple from an automated perspective if the word אנא, the number 1501, were inserted between each word. I could see this resonating positions both far and deep, between where the number was found and where the number is, and between the bearer of the number, and the one who meets the bearer.

This has made me think of a story, of a girl lost on her own (50). A man believes he has found her, and rushes to her side. The rest cannot see her, so they call him crazy, but he does not relent. His cries go unanswered, until he imagines they are but the sound of silence. Still, he does not relent (51. 5150), because he loves her, even if she will never know. One day the terror on all sides begins to lessen; it begins to reshape. The man begins to realize that God remains in the silence, choosing a man, choosing his cause (52). With balanced scales and the lightest touch, the stage is set, that the Daughter is free and protected, but most of all loved. Head or tail made near'y immaterial by ha'p'orth bet, we must agree on meaningful exchange between us, but we have time to do it. Like a signal in the silence a voice is heard within these city walls "Time, Times, half a time." 26, 52, 13. An override? "One step forward, two steps back. Two step again, as they choose." I feel "always" echo from just ahead, looking more like a mirror as I squint, reflecting my weathered skin, laugh lines, and other signs of time's toll. I start to realize though that a juncture changed here... A domino falls, so do they all.