Love By Calculation and Shape
I am just imagining again, this time by picturing myself there, that The LORD has found Adam and Eve after they just gained the knowledge of good and evil by eating of the fruit. This time though, I saw a glimpse of how The LORD might see this, and how a timeless perspective could appear. Distilling this down to pure logic, let's say that The LORD sees X paths laid out from that moment. On one of these X paths The Lord sees Adam and Eve again, after agreements, prices, what not have all been reconciled; on the rest (X-1 paths) this does not happen, they never meet again. Let's say these X paths represent all possible permutations of action/reaction within Creation. God chooses to reconcile, chooses that single path over any other in the field.
A few questions come to mind: Why did God choose that path over any other? What is the value of X (how many total paths could there be)? If each final location was reached by a unique path, and can be uniquely defined (digitized, perhaps) by the decisions made at each juncture, what is the upper limit of the total paths that could be required to guarantee the one path where Adam, Eve, and the Lord all reconcile exists? If that singular path were not chosen, which is likely equivalent to saying "if God were not love," could another path actually be chosen where the system at large retains its integrity? Is there a limit to X (saturation) such that the singular path and destination of reconciliation can no longer be reached by all parties? Is there a point where an alternate path to reconciliation, or class/field of similar paths, emerge? If so, could these alternate paths/destinations be differentiated and, if so, is there a population /saturation for X past where they can no longer be differentiated? Is it possible to embed all of these answers into the value of "love" itself, the same value that identifies the path/destination in the field, so that when love's form is viewed it can be known that all of these other equations were resolved in its discovery/solution, even if it is equally known that an observer could not calculate either love or many of these equations acting as love's cobblestones, puzzle pieces, structure, etc.? I have many questions today, finding myself in unfamiliar territory, but not complaining, for the view.
Comments
Post a Comment