Communication Between Light and Darkness

I looked myself in the eye in the mirror today and the sight of my pupils reminded me of black holes. I considered the concept of dilation, and how this change in apparent size would need to represent a gain or loss of matter traditionally, but that thought made me recall the theory that one could communicate through black holes instantaneously, though this message would come at the expense of the mass of the outgoing black hole. All at once I considered that this communication balance may be a perpetual and communal function of pupils, and, more precisely, observers. If I use my "light based theory of reality" as a starting position, then the light does not observe itself, but must be observed to retain meaning. This fits, as well, with John 1:5 "The light shines in the darkness, and the darkness has not overcome/understood it." as this image requires both light and darkness as independent observing perspectives. It may be that communication from light, and observation by darkness are the fundamental requirements/positions for time (for that realm/angle, at a minimum, not to be static).

If observation within a system becomes extremely dense in a location, it may impact the passage of time in that region and perhaps in the system at large. This might be a frontier between the individual subjective experience of time and the scientific understanding of the passage of time, especially as the system itself (which would govern physics or at least our understanding of it) observes directly or focuses observation further (increased observation density, but perhaps from no source that can be pinpointed).

This is reminding me of something else that I realized today: If/When only God possessed the knowledge of good and evil, this represented an infinite binary system (something possessing the irrational form of pi, perhaps). This meant that everything would be relatively easy to find, repair, and reset in the realm, as these anchor positions would be fully known by God. Once woman ate of the fruit though, her perspective on the knowledge of good and evil became important to God/The LORD as well (beneficial for gaining wisdom?), but the development of these perspectives would be like placing these anchors, which are important, somewhere in an infinite field, outside of the original dimensions of the equation for God. This may have resulted in a return to a static state as well, with The LORD identifying these new anchors as easily as The LORD's own, without interference, but the woman gave the fruit to the man and he ate it as well before The LORD returned. This would have created a different pair of anchors (a man's perspective of the knowledge of good and evil), and interactions between these and the woman's anchors, before The LORD returned, potentially creating a problem with reconciling the equation that would take even The LORD time to solve- possessing this problem would then remove the static state of the overall equation. 

It is definitely interesting to how how reconciling perspectives along all applicable (possible) axes seems to already be the focus of the numbers I have been examining, such as Graham's Number and TREE, and that reconciliation would be the issue before The LORD at that juncture. This fits exceptionally well, I am finding, with shaping the concepts of sin and forgiveness into something tangible, perhaps even calculable, by picturing them as dissonance between complex perspectives (a radio mistuned?). These numbers seem to indicate the same thing: after just a couple of steps they become unfathomably large from a single human consciousness' perspective. I could see this then requiring an amount of "time" to resolve, even with all power and knowledge, if time is like a game of ping pong between light's message and darkness' observation, my "turn based reality" concept, because, even if every turn is maximized by The LORD, the moves must be observed and be considered valid by the other perspectives, in order to retain a connection/resonance/tether, while the other changes are being made. This would also explain how the timing is known, but cannot be directly conveyed- in this case the darkness observing and agreeing does influence reality directly, so this perspective "knowing" the timing would change the timing, creating a paradox without careful architecture. The commandment "Be fruitful and multiply" (Genesis 1:28) leads me to believe that additional perspectives are not only not a concern, but are actually preferred when it comes to The LORD reconciling the perspectives involved. Once again I am seeing how this ties in with the reason behind these giant numbers- there comes a point of saturation, where all active perspectives would represent such a large part of the possible equation that they could not help but be reconciled in the solving of it. It feels like this would have something to do with an observational density threshold reached, perhaps a moment of maximum system frustration, forcing one of a relatively limited menu of choices, despite the unfathomable nature of the numbers/inputs being used to resolve permutations. It may be that this juncture represents a stasis along certain lines as well, with the combination of limited choice and stasis within a virtually limitless pool being the signal that an equation of this magnitude has been solved from a perspective. It feels like if each of these is like a sprout, translating this to harvest time in the fields paints an easy to follow image of when God knows that perspectives have been aligned, and reconciliation of the equation will also result in reconciliation of all perspectives, forgiveness of all sin.