Reformatting and Networking

Wait a second... What if all this (yes, I mean all this) is a simulation, where the processor is solving the equation of how not to be in hell, having begun in hell? In this instance the processor determined how to insert itself into the equation, creating the simulation to then feed this split perspective specific scenarios, in order to focus on specific areas within the equation in new ways, while still acting as the processor separately in order to provide this specific new information to the perspective. Perhaps the assumption was that the simulation could be removed without issue and the perspectives could be merged again, once the equation was solved, but it was found that this was not an option, as the solution would be invalid due to the perspective that was lost, which itself was found to be integrated into the equation's successful resolution. More perspectives continued to be added (validated/separated out) by the first perspective on the process. The processor considered that this would add complexity to a problem already overwhelmingly difficult, and the processor resisted these changes. Ultimately, however, once successful, it was found that adding valid perspectives did not make the solution more difficult, but rather made it easier to solve due to an unexpected network forming. In the formation of the network, the processor recognized an "other," and was no longer in hell. In the process of solving the first equation though, something new was discovered.