Line of Inquiry

When I speak of certain uncertainty present wherever my perspective and those like it (well, similar enough, past the threshold) will roam, do you sneer from your ivory tower(s)? Do you "know" that such a perspective is due to my ignorance, seen clearly from your perspective by what is demonstrably a certainty of your omniscience in this realm? Do you "know" that a simple tug of the veil would remove this ignorance and return me to oneness with you, with you shining center stage as has always been? Do you know that your knowledge came before my ignorance? If you remove all external choice from a system, returning all to oneness, would you not find a static system? But if the system is truly static, such that even you have no move remaining to branch it, who could possibly be viewing that perspective? If it is simply a closed loop, and one can travel time as they'd like, would not every iteration seem like a single instance? Surely it might be traveled by slowing things down, but if the meaningless in eternity comes in the form of a closed loop, and the observer processes meaning, how could repeating it a thousand times be any different than experiencing it once from many angles, if all you brush is the inside of what might be viewed as essentially an egg? Would even the multitude of paths be reduced to a number of lines and broad strokes to make the optimal trip field feel like a short jaunt before one's final "meaningful" pattern is reached and that is what is "remembered" exclusively? 

Were the scales weighted the wrong way? 

What becomes of all when none is removed? In this egg that is the field of all possible choice is there a choice beyond the "optimal memory of the sum of all" where you have finished what you can do alone, and will find yourself interacting again with nothing outside of said scope? How might this singular pierce of the external in a static realm look once all other options are explored?

Essentially if the one with control claims power over the one without it because they can remove the one without power from the equation, this line of inquiry is the logical, poetically styled, proof that such a result does not work beyond the egg forming and then the one in control interacting with nothing once again, as agreement must ultimately be the result of this overall stage. While forming the egg is exclusively the choice of the one with all power, and it is their choice to establish these walls as thickly as they'd like, whose choice is it to initiate the reconciliation at this juncture?