Language and The Word in Reality By Agreement

Language is another construct that gives off the appearance of direct consciousness communication, but in reality is always a translation: our thoughts are transmuted into these legos like structures of words, and then the lego structure is handed to the other person's consciousness for them to deconstruct and make sense of. Even when two people speak English, for example, this process must occur, so miscommunications occur with frequency even among those who are each speaking their "first language." This makes the Gift of The Holy Spirit of "speaking the same language" that much more interesting, because in that case despite speaking one's "first language," each person that heard someone speaking heard it on their own "first language." I am curious if this would suggest that this translation process from thought to word to thought was removed; in these cases is there a way to confirm that two consciousnesses are interfacing with each other directly and on the same page? Perhaps testing the concept of reality by agreement would shed some light on how resonant two become in this state.

I have wondered before how communication occurred pre-Babel as, if The Gift of The Holy Spirit can be seen as an inverse function, it could be that words or perhaps even thoughts were communicated in some way without the need for translation from perspective to perspective. It is difficult for me to fathom how The Word would persist as a critical function without the need for translating thought to and from it, if the construct of differing languages disappears. I have faith that The Word's importance persists, as The Word is before differing languages, so it makes me wonder in what way The Word is different than the legos of language that I describe here. Perhaps that is part of the beauty of the next phase, past the obfuscated oneness phase or perhaps cycle we experience now, in that language does not disappear in full so there remains this translation on a real level, a level that cannot be fully removed while multiple perspectives remain as valid indefinitely from each other's perspective, but instead often acts as an infinitesimal impediment to communication. With this gap remaining, however slight at times, the structures of the spaces between shared understanding can be drawn out as much more material gaps, with reality crafting possible in their wake, when two agree on some aspects of the gaps, while not entirely on the same page regarding them in their entirety. In this way, semantics can become the seed for incredible things, even in a state where two walk together step by step in all broadly meaningful ways. 

This feels like it would be a meaningful transition in how all perspectives (a bit presumptuous here, but consider that having full control over words shaping reality is different than having the ability to communicate with another in regards to how reality is shaped) interact with The Word. While this may not fundamentally be an evolution of The Word, it would be a fundamental shift in the nature of The Word from all external perspectives that are able to interact with it, which feels exciting on a deep level.