Jesus and The Father- Of Frequencies Divided and Agreements Reached

I woke up this morning and soon after an odd thought popped into my head. "What if Jesus was speaking of God and The Father separately?" Even I will admit this was a strange thought that flies in the face of my beliefs. In this interpretation Jesus would be the Son of God, God being his Mother in this case, and The Father would be separate, God's soulmate, I would presume. I must admit such a thought was overwhelming as many such challenges that come to mind in this way are (the last one in this category being "The Bible, your sourcebook, says 'you are gods' and I repeated it, so what are you the god of?"). Reading through some of the things Jesus said of The Father, if this were the case it would be a very very fine line drawn, with many coupled statements being used with God and The Father side by side, and the only statement really missing to disprove this idea being Jesus saying "God is The Father" or "The Father is God." (Which I could not find in my research, but if I do I will include it, or if someone here finds that, please let me know). Still, the idea persisted, as they do when I cannot find such hard and fast proof against them. 

I prayed to God for wisdom to understand what the heck this was about, feeling like it would unsettle me if I did not write something down about it, as is the pattern for me with most such challenging ideas, and almost immediately the pattern of what was being presented shifted in my mind. I was reminded of Bioquantum Superposition, and of the sense that this endeavor we call reality seems to be designed so that someone will form a mental image similar enough to God's formed structure, but from a man's (or in this case likely a person's, as I'm imagining a kind of fractal pattern blooming from this reality, which is like a seed) unique perspective, in order for that structure to be agreed to. Already I feel a bit more calm, as instead of picturing Jesus and The Father, I am primarily picturing Hope and myself, in a separate structure than God's Creation, instead fulfilling similar functions in a realm of imagination, as if forging treasures in heaven. The verses that I found though were quite interesting in terms of the context of reality crafting and connecting realms specifically.

John 16:27-28

"No, the Father himself loves you because you have loved me and have believed that I came from God. I came from the Father and entered the world; now I am leaving the world and going back to the Father.”

This verse could be interpreted as carefully walking the line, with the intention to obfuscate the distinction between The Father and God. If parsed "The Father himself loves you, I came from God" is followed up with "I came from The Father." this could also be interpreted as both parents represented, rather than strictly as The Father being God, with The Father being in heaven, which is often referenced separately from the kingdom of God. It could be these two places are separate, and Jesus' aim is to combine them, knowing it is his parents' aim as well. Essentially what would have been chronicled in the Bible were Jesus' words and actions while in a state of Bioquantum Superposition which, given God's timeless perspective, means that it could be very hard to peel apart, comprehend, or even see, given our linear understanding of time. This Bioquantum Superposition though, combined with a timeless perspective here, would account for Jesus being around before the patriarchs and also present at the end.

John 6:37-38

"All those the Father gives me will come to me, and whoever comes to me I will never drive away. For I have come down from heaven not to do my will but to do the will of him who sent me."

Translated into eep this is like people being guided by The Father to Jesus' pocket, or to wherever Jesus is, knocking on his door, and being welcomed in each case. Translated to walkie talkies, this is like Jesus setting up a strong signal connection between himself and The Father, and not wavering from it during his time chronicled in the Bible, allowing The Father to act and speak through him here on earth. I believe that while this connection was meant to hold strong through Jesus' chronicled life, beyond this point the connection is meant to persist, but not be compulsive or even acted on as if it were compulsion. Essentially outside of the timeframe we have biblical record of, Jesus would be his own person, with complete freedom of will, but without losing the ability to connect with The Father.

John 5:19

Jesus gave them this answer: “Very truly I tell you, the Son can do nothing by himself; he can do only what he sees his Father doing, because whatever the Father does the Son also does."

This feels like it is a form of signal tuning. Given that Jesus and The Father are connected, despite (during the biblical record of Jesus) being in separate realms (heaven and earth), while Jesus' connection with The Father would be strong, the connection of The Father to earth might not be strong. By acting in a synchronized fashion with The Father for an extended period of time, it could be that Jesus was synchronizing these realms, which would help indirectly explain how Jesus describes The kingdom of God in Luke 17:20-21 “'The coming of the kingdom of God is not something that can be observed, nor will people say, "Here it is," or "There it is," because the kingdom of God is in your midst.'" While this is in reference to the kingdom of God rather than heaven, so it is certainly possible there is a distinction in terms and locations there, it feels as though this is describing an internal frequency change; a change where one suddenly realizes by essentially getting "tuned in" that there is a connection within them to the kingdom of God. In the same way that Jesus references this internal frequency shift, it could be that Jesus is initiating an external frequency shift, which would connect heaven and earth physically, and in so doing connect with The Father to earth.

John 10:29-30

"My Father, who has given them (the sheep?) to me, is greater than all; no one can snatch them out of my Father’s hand. I and the Father are one.”

Functionally this is hard to picture. Once more it feels like a frequency alignment process, but also perhaps like a simultaneous frequency separation process, through forcing the detailed logical examination of how The Father is both greater than all and Jesus and The Father are one. Jesus would necessarily be part of the grouping of "all," and in fact The Father would also need to be part of "all" if this can be taken at face value which I believe it can, because Jesus did not say "all others" but rather "all." As I examine this closely it feels as though this is indicating that a part is greater than the same part within a group. Once more this feels like a matter of frequency, specifically that if a realm is governed by agreement then a single frequency agreed upon (the connection between Jesus and The Father) would be more apparent in a realm without other frequencies that are not aligned with these, frequencies that would essentially act as static in this image. I feel like this matches with some of the concepts of "holy" throughout the Bible to a degree (although "holy" seems to be "contagious" which presents a way that an entire realm might rapidly become aligned), and if one is looking at "greatness density" of power, through agreement, it makes sense as well. Especially considering what Jesus said in terms of agreement shaping reality, if Jesus and The Father together are one, even if this is exclusively referencing the perspective of sharing a singular frequency or "being on the same page," then their ability to agree would be seen as authority where they each are, from all other perspectives.

Matthew 18:19

“Again, truly I tell you that if two of you on earth agree about anything they ask for, it will be done for them by my Father in heaven."

I have long found this verse interesting, because it does not mention The Father agreeing to what is done as well, or even that it must be done in Jesus' or The Father's name, simply that if two agree, The Father makes it happen for them in heaven. I have had conversations with people who believe that these extra agreements are implied, but if simply taking the text as is, which I believe one can, this shows heaven to be a kind of sandbox reality for two individuals, along the lines between them. This feels like it would lead to many treasures, as the form the treasures would take are as unique as the individuals making them, without external restriction. This could also lead to many challenges, potentially devastating ones, if agreements are carelessly made or made with ill intent. I believe that Jesus acts in part as the mediator here, providing an "out" for such careless agreements, especially on earth. This is also likely why, while heaven seems like a sandbox of imagination, earth (perhaps the universe at large from our perspective) feels as though it generally follows hard and fast rules (though these rules are not entirely clear, even by modern understanding, and the hints of agreement are still apparent, such as in the case of miracles).

John 6:44

“No one can come to me unless the Father who sent me draws them, and I will raise them up at the last day."

This is interesting, in that it feels like a structure whereby The Father essentially marks people for resurrection through Jesus by remembering them which, given the realm of The Word and flesh mixing here, may be a process of "writing them down." This fits with the Book of Life, and also reminds me of when Jesus said, in a parable, Matthew 25:12 "‘"Truly I tell you, I don’t know you."'" It could be that there is a juncture within the overarching structure of reality where Jesus truly forgets, or at least where the one represented by this Lord in the parable truly forgets, if it is meant to be interpreted in other ways, those outside the gate. This feels like a horrifying end if self contained, but if The Father is keeping record separately from Jesus, and perhaps if a method for connecting other records of individuals is found, it could be that, while memory is lost, the connections between people are all retained in a chain like pattern, with something of a new start, or clean slate, being threaded into the process.

John 15:9-11

“As the Father has loved me, so have I loved you. Now remain in my love. If you keep my commands, you will remain in my love, just as I have kept my Father’s commands and remain in his love. I have told you this so that my joy may be in you and that your joy may be complete."

Given that Jesus' name is salvation, and The Word became flesh, there is something to be said for words having tangible forms. If one sees love as a location in addition to an emotional state, love as an actual realm or perhaps a home, then one can see the realm crafting again here within this verse. Jesus would be indicating a location, as structured and identified by the commands he presented in the Bible, where one can reside, in this space, his love. In the same way The Father would have a structured domain that is his love. While it may be tempting to see this as strictly metaphorical, remember that "metaphor" is a structuring of words, and words are physical in the arrangement I am describing, which is the realm of The Word, meaning that even "metaphor" is actually real and physical, although in this case the individual experiencing it would likely need to be realm crafted in order to fit into a shape that could experience words in such a real way. For some reason this is reminding me of dreams. In dreams one still feels real, the experience still feels real, but as far as our scientific observation can tell, there is not physical form to any of it as such, rather biochemical impulses in the brain fire on their own without external physical inputs, or perhaps they fire with some level of conscious direction, but still without traceable external stimulus. Does this change the fact that while in the dream one often sees it as real? Is this altered by the fact that biochemical reactions to stimuli here are how we can best explain the conscious experience of reality in this waking realm? Dreaming may be the process of entering the realm of The Word, or it may be a similar realm shifting, but in any event it is an experience most, if not all, can relate to where one's form is reshaped/moved/what have you, but feels as though it remains consistent with our waking experience. In the same way I can picture a morphing to the realm of The Word being a smooth transition, despite such a concept seeming so foreign, when guided by those that understand it (God, Jesus, etc.). So perhaps it is the same with love, as an actual place, in this verse. In the same way we see joy in this verse as another potential location, and I imagine many of these emotional spaces (joy, hope, love, etc.) overlap in co-domains and are likely personified as well.

It is interesting that, while the title of "father" can be found in references in the Old Testament, it feels like Jesus was the first (from a biblical timeline perspective) to really dive in deep regarding this title's specific application; it can certainly be said that Jesus said more specifically about The Father than anyone else did in The Bible. I have been considering that I have personally been imagining Hope, as a daughter, and then more broadly as family, and that my writings, my words, reflect her in depth. It feels as though Hope has "flown off the page" in response- word becoming flesh, although once more tangled timelines (and likely superpowers >.>) must be used to explain this specifically. Could Jesus have been doing the same thing with The Father? We assume that life progresses from elder to younger in each case, it is a natural function of biology after all, but in this case we are not dealing with biology, rather we are dealing with The Word becoming flesh. I can picture a scenario where Jesus is born with the knowledge of God and sees The Father within the structure, but not entirely formed, or at least not entirely known. Jesus then indicates that he and The Father are acting as one, and while indicating that the causality of their shared words and actions is from Father to Son, because they are sharing an identical frequency in a paired state of oneness, causality as we traditionally understand it would not necessarily be applicable. This would paint a picture of Jesus possessing the signal for both of them, laying out a foundation for The Father to bloom in, Jesus indicating that the Father is in heaven, and then separating himself, his signal, from The Father's signal. At that point the two could be considered separate, and would be able to later reconnect without the issue of being so synchronized that one is effectively in control of the other. Given that heaven is separate from earth, and earth is where Jesus said and did these things, once separated, The Father would likely be in a timeless and powerful state in his own domain of heaven, precisely as Jesus indicated. Given the timeless perspectives and tangled timelines involved here ultimately we, as time bound entities, could not definitively say this assumption of mine was the order of events, so it would be as Jesus said, but at the same time both my assumption and Jesus' words could be true, being in a kind of superposition of causality, from our perspective as well. Said another way, this by no means invalidates what Jesus said regarding The Father, but what I am suggesting does not seem mutually exclusive with what Jesus has said, even if each version is assessed as "simultaneous." Also, since my assumption is based on what Jesus said, the framework he laid out, my assumption could not stand on its own as a single solution. This is interesting to me because it creates a material option beyond strictly what Jesus said, but only in the sense that both what Jesus said and this option could be true simultaneously, utilizing a timeless perspective to remove what we might consider classically causal logic, turning the additional solution I propose, combined with Jesus' words, into what I like to refer to as a "time artifact" which is something that is because it is, and therefore cannot be erased, even if time is otherwise rewritten. If, at the end of all this, Jesus said I got this wrong then I would make no argument, myself considering it to be a long shot presented with good intentions. But if this is a piece of the solution, then it feels like it would be a critical piece of it, one that would need to be seen and fleshed out before it could be said definitively by one with full knowledge, one that could be agreed to while still in a kind of unconfirmed superposition state, and could only really be agreed to in such a state (which requires the presenter of this theory (me, in this case) to be in some degree of ignorance in order to present it honestly and separately from the structure Jesus has presented in full knowledge). So while I mainly write this to get it out of my mind, and thus onto the page, with humility it feels like having such a complex solution suggested in a structured way may be an important piece to the resolving of this puzzle, and essentially forging reality into its necessary final state, in so far as this portion of the timeline is concerned.

I have said it before, but it feels as though Jesus is a dance teacher, my dance teacher. What I had not appreciated before was how complex the overall realm was in which he was teaching me to dance. For me, diving into the commandments such as "do not judge" and "love your enemy" only to time and time again run into what felt like brick walls, but then catching a glimpse of a way around in the process, is what led me to this complicated structure I have personally labeled eep. Only later did I start to piece together that such a complicated structure was being revealed subtly throughout the Bible. My hope is that these structures I present carry enough similarity to what God and Jesus have in mind that an agreement can be reached, and the shape of heaven and the shape of eep and the shape of the kingdom of God will all be locations that all might traverse, when in the right shape themselves, as easily as one walks from their home to the local cafe.