Crab Log Fish Frog- The Paired Particle Machine

I was considering yesterday, what if one combines the crab, log, fish, frog idea (pulling a point of meaningful information quickly from a field) with the time dilation particle pair idea (running a processing loop outside of one's own timeline, getting significantly more processing out of a moment here than could be acheived utilizing processing here)? Last night I had a dream that included discussing an idea with another guy which involved an image of a brilliant pattern that included concentric circles on the inside, and other geometric shapes, with varying numbers of sides, on the outside (triangles, squares, hexagons, etc.). This felt like a visual representation of what I was considering yesterday, a kind of pattern that repeated for an exceptionally long time, but one that was self contained- it was neither infinitely repeating nor irrational. It feels like such a structure would be of benefit within the equation I am picturing, although it feels as though the equation itself would need to persist (this may be a matter of perspective though). The manifestations of this image I saw would be like large chunks of stability within the equation, not predictable in their precession perse, but predictable in that they would last a significant amount of time within the field, 10^13 days is what I had said in the dream.

So I picture that the fish and frog are perhaps like the paired particles- not necessarily part of the original calculation for the machine, of the largest prime number possible, but instead picking a prime from the field, searching for a specific meaningful point in the field they are in (which would equate to the log in the analogy used). Shifting this from a scientifically testable machine to something that is outside of our current realm of scientific understanding, what if instead of passing through empty space the fish and frog were simply in reality? What if particle pairing were the core of us, the soul, and this core is partnered still, which would essentially be my idea of soulmates as it relates to paired particles? Scientifically it seems like we can comprehend that the link between particles remains even after interactions with other things, but we cannot calculate how the new pairing would work well enough to predict a paired result. This would be like this fish and frog each interacting with reality, but each being influenced by how their partner interacted with reality as well, although in most cases of these pairings they would likely be unaware that this was happening or how, neither would they be aware of what influence this connection would have on their processing. Still, the link would persist, and for one with full understanding of reality, I imagine it could be used to identify something meaningful from reality, once the paired paths were completed. According to the machine model, it would actually only require one of the pair to be examined externally in this way, and the other one would be influenced. The change measured of the examined particle would be used as the input into the machine to start its cycle, based on the observations made regarding the one that was originally influenced (in the machine the one that is changed has been traveling for longer from an observer's perspective, and the one that generates the new input has been traveling less time, which is how the processing can occur outside of the timeline of the observer). Adapting this to the model with the fish/frog pair, it seems as though the one influenced would then want to be left to interact with reality for a time after the influence, and then read again. In this way the influence combined with reality could then be examined as a result. If the pairing were allowed to persist, it could be set up so that even this "influence from reality" stage could be examined immediately, by examining the other paired particle again, if another time loop method were used, although the specifics of how that might work are hard to picture right now.

So now what if we assume the observer is God, and that the machine is Creation? In this scenario, God would be separating us into pairs and having us run through Creation. One is influenced, then once the journey has ended for the other of the pair, that information would be gathered, and then that information could be used as a new input. I feel as though there is something lacking in the analogy though, due to a timeless perspective, and due to there being different goals from a human perspective and from God's perspective- while humans would be looking to calculate something, I imagine God would be looking for something that could not be calculated- that said, I will describe my thoughts, acknowledging that perspective of/in time may be materially different. Viewed another way, the one with the new input (perhaps the one "influenced" in the first loop) would come first in this timeline in particular, and the one that is read would take a longer time to experience reality so the information might be gained. I could certainly imagine the machine being used to determine the specific series of interactions the observed of the pair experienced and communicating that back, rather than sending back information on other pieces of processed information. In this way, with enough time dilation, one could end up with a kind of blank slate Adam in the first week of Creation, and also Eve, being partnered with him, having experienced the timeline. I can also picture, as an alternative, the information from the machine regarding the individuals' experiences being stored in the fruit of the knowledge of good and evil, and so perhaps when Eve ate of it she saw her full journey which led back to there, whereas Adam would not have seen anything perse when eating the fruit, representing the "young" particle, having not taken a journey yet (this is an example, I am unsure on the specific identity of the pieces here). If this is the case it could be that the knowledge of good and evil was forbidden because what was needed of the process for a match was retained without the rest of the journey being remembered, additional pieces that may have been painful to remember. In eating of the fruit, it is interesting that you would essentially end up with a machine inside a machine, a kind of redundant or recursive loop. This redundancy would have been known to be possible by God, which is perhaps why the fruit would be accessible (perhaps out of necessity), but I am curious to know if the results of such a recursion would be known. I also wonder how we might calculate the reality we experience if we assumed it was the result of two particles passing through a field twice (or x times), once without interaction here, and again with interaction here. It would be an interesting model to examine anyway.

I could certainly see the proof of soulmates, from the perspective of the soulmates, being an aspect of the processing of the machine. While this function would be known to be valid from God's position from the start, the external verification of the concept would be seen to be accomplished by the successful processing of the machine. Ultimately this would connect the result of the machine (which may be God's soulmate, it may be the self verifiable existence of another, it may be something else or all of this and more; I imagine this would only be limited by what God might want to process, something that would not be readily apparent or immediately possible from the perspective of omniscience and omnipotence within Creation) with the confirmed processing accuracy of the machine. This pairing of the result and the accuracy of processing, each having their necessity from a perspective, has an elegance to it which I cannot fully describe.

The actual specifics of the machine are still hazy to me, but in a kind of delightful way, as if the remaining uncertainty is the uncertainty that remains for love's sake. I imagine the shape of this machine could be calculated from other perspectives in order to provide proof from those perspectives but, from my perspective, glimpsing the machine in its current form is blessing aplenty. It is like the haze formed up into a machine in my view and understanding, with me already inside it, in what I would consider to be the perfect position inside it (a position just across from my soulmate, with the path between clearing). I can also conceive of how this perfect position would be seen as something desired by others, but something they would ultimately understand that they needed to emulate from their own perspectives, not in a way that would displace me from my own position. So each would move into position to be across from their own soulmate just in time for fulfillment (which would also trigger the fulfillment). I have pictured before a kind of circle, where a specific distance from the center represented one's perfect path, and one's orientation across from one's soulmate their perfect position; the path and position would be linked in a way so that one could not be reached without the other, and I imagine with each unique path one would find that their own specific place around the circle's edge had also been predetermined, and that the whole circle was complete, just in time.

I wrote in my notes for this post the idea of "The U-Turn" which is like a moment where one has gone as far as they can in their own realm and then must turn around for any additional steps to be taken, but when they do they are markedly different. In terms of this machine and analogy The U-Turn might represent the junctures in a multi-dimensional space where the perspective of which particle has been traveling longer or shorter might switch, which one has been influenced or measured is switched, and possibly where the fish was a frog and vice versa, as the barriers between water and lillypads become blurred and then return to tangibility, but perhaps in a different arrangement. If it is anything like the black and white ring that I once saw, this transition occurs just off screen (or at least so zoomed in as to be outside of one's perception), and things look nearly identical just a moment later when perspective returns, but it is as if one feels that things have changed, perhaps have become inverted. In the scientific version of the machine, from the paired particle's shared perspective the same amount of time passed for each regardless of the observed perspective, so any such change would actually be entirely outside of this paired perspective, but under the right circumstances could a external reversal of time or pocket dimensions becoming main space and vice versa (this reordering of space being similar to what was described soon after The Big Bang). These are the levels on which one's reality could change though, fundamental agreements, although from one's own perspective the shift would likely be dismissed soon after experiencing it, as things went back to normal. I have also described this as an upcoming Chaos Storm, these analogies of The U-Turn and Chaos Storm feel similar within the confines. Perhaps all of this is meant to explain that it will all come to a head, reach maximum chaos, but I will see it for only a short time, and then things will move into a state similar to now in many ways, but more as I have pictured them, the body of agreements adjusted in the process to shift reality from how it has been in this timeline and the world as we have known it, to eep. I imagine that for me this means the whole transition will be a lot smoother than I have pictured it; hopefully this will be true for all, in good heart and with mercy.