Consequences of the Logical Proof of Love

I just considered a function of love being logic based, and therefore having provable reason. Mercy would also be a logical response, even in a court of justice, or presumably even in one of karmic style balance, if all was known (I am unclear as to how, but this seems logical somehow and matches my beliefs). The issue is that if Jesus is the defense attorney for any single person with sin, it would seem that in the process of making the defense, the logical threads of love and mercy would need to be revealed, as points of "evidence" in regards to the validity of the use of such defenses. While the complexity of individual cases may allow for some delay, I just pictured that from the very first person defended, all souls ("soul" being conscious and subconscious as one in this use) witnessing the trial will understand how every trial will go and why. If God's mystery had not yet been revealed, it would be revealed on this day, I would imagine.

While this would obviously shift our understanding of reality, and there would be a huge weight removed from all witnesses, I can imagine also that great care would be required in preparing for this day as well. I have brought up the importance of disagreement in the perpetuation of a meaningful reality, and if this day of trial were not set up precisely, there would be no logical way to disagree from then on, and we would all effectively collapse into one mind or soul, an Echad state of oneness similar if not the same as in the beginning. As one who has spent a lifetime establishing and testing my own values, I think a certain meaning would be lost for me if something like that were to occur.

Therefore the proof of God and the proof of love are dangerous games to play, if individuality is to be preserved after this logical proof has been completed. I don't think this will be an issue, we are in good hands, it is just interesting to consider that it could be an issue, and how.