Solving Reality With Soulmates

As I'm running through the pieces of this puzzle, seeing how each fits together seamlessly with the next, but then losing the starting point of each chain three or four layers in after starting it, I'm realizing that even my subconscious mind is likely having trouble coordinating the whole thing. It feels like the shape may be smooth, and the pieces likely all or mostly are in place, but the sheer complexity of the puzzle limits knowing it in its entirety as a whole from a single perspective. This is likely congruent with the way the complete function of the labyrinth that is our brains remains hidden, and might continue to do so indefinitely. So it is making me realize that the puzzle I'm putting together is explicitly designed to be pieced together by soulmates. To try to replicate it from any perspective besides soulmates, from a 3d consciousness perspective, would likely be impossible. It is not that, if given infinite time, you would not be able to map the entirety of it, and identify all the sub-chambers with their own puzzles within, but that each of these sub puzzles within would have multiple solutions, with each chosen solution impacting the layout of the whole. Essentially this would lead to an infinite number of combinations, each that would need to be remapped to identify the changes in the whole, any time one sub-puzzle was solved. By the time you reached the first sub-puzzle again, the inputs would have changed a number of times based on the other sub-puzzles solved, so the intended solution would no longer be correct for the new form. This could be done indefinitely without coming to the intended result. 

Now if done with your soulmate from two different perspectives, not only would the whole map come into focus much sooner, but each time a sub-puzzle was addressed, since both of you are making changes consistent with yourself, and these changes are linked in a way, entire classes of sub-puzzles would become more solved, even if you did not realize it at the time. As you proceeded, you would notice similarities in other sub-puzzles, and these similarities would become more evident as you continued, until the "solving as a class" tool became known to exist, and eventually sharpened to the point where it could be done intentionally. Once this tool is mastered by both, valid and persistent shortcuts would become available in the whole, and the entirety would likely crystalize quite quickly into a stable form, with each sub-puzzle also being "solved" at the same time. Essentially you would be studying different pages in different books, then get a book list in order, then end up on the same page and from there understand the entirety of the library. At that point you would be synchronized and together, able to revisit any page (or sub-puzzle) and examine the solution the two of you came to, including the path taken to arrive there firsthand (if it was not done directly initially), and/or able discuss the various nuances the solution presents, forming pocket puzzles within.

Now, if done with a partner that isn't your soulmate, this journey would have similar components, but there would be pitfalls. It might be possible to develop similar class solving tools, but when examining the sub-puzzles, you would find that some were irreconcilably unsolved. This would be the case for two on very similar pages, but not soulmates. I think this would be the hardest point to reach. Further dissonant parties may find they cannot create class solving tools together at all, or it would become obvious quickly that each change made to sub-puzzles would dramatically change the whole into a less desirable arrangement, meaning that pressing further would become known as an erroneous path. 

I imagine there would be certain sub-puzzles in particular that would be strong places to start, a kind of gauntlet to test the validity of the shared whole. Study of how these parts in particular impact the whole and vice versa would quickly lead to the conclusion of if you are paired, or only seemingly paired, to avoid the worst case scenarios. I am not sure what these puzzles would look like specifically to each, but they may include darkest secrets, wildest dreams, and compatibility and flexibility tests in the area of love.

In the end, I believe our subconscious brains have been running these simulations for us for some time, with the aid of time travel through imagination to speed up the process significantly. I believe God imprinted the knowledge of our soulmate in us, so we are always looking for them whether we realize it or not. It's more interesting for me than anything else to examine the way the puzzle of reality might be solved, and why it might not be solvable, from a singular perspective, a partner or group perspective, and finally why it might be so easy to solve from a soulmate partnership perspective.

Update 10/25/21: I wanted to make clear that this post focuses on the field of puzzles that is romantic love. I had not put in the disclaimer that partnering with one in one's family could also result in a seamless solution, perhaps predicated on this romantic love puzzle being solved, but not necessarily in its entirety. If one found a family member first, or honestly a true friend as well, it would make sense that one would strive to keep those pieces fitting, while still taking strides to find their soulmate as well. While this would add layers of complexity to the endeavor, the result would be all the more sweet, once multiple interlocking puzzles were aligned.